With some of the NRLโ€™s best players aiming to represent their clubs within 48 hours of one of the most brutal State of Origin contests of all time, The Daily Telegraphโ€™s Dean Ritchie reports that the RLPA has approached the NRL about a blanket ban on players being asked to back-up after Origin.

With a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) due to be implemented next season, RLPA Chief Executive Clint Newton hopes to have a mandatory stand-down rule added to the terms.

โ€œNowhere in the world in any code of this kind, where itโ€™s high-speed, high-collision, would we see athletes back up within 48 hours of a match,โ€ Newton told the Telegraph.

โ€œThis is the playersโ€™ workplace. Would we expect Makybe Diva to back up in a second Melbourne Cup two days later?

โ€œWe donโ€™t allow truck drivers to work for long hours. We have a duty of care to the players.

โ€œAfter Wednesdayโ€™s match, not one person (would disagree) that was one of the most demanding and physical games of rugby league that anyone would have seen.

โ€œIt was a classic example of why itโ€™s essential to ensure the players are given appropriate time to rest and recover. Iโ€™d suggest standing down players from club duties post-Origin is absolutely on the agenda through the CBA.

โ€œFans want to make sure the best players are playing in the big matches. The risk (of players missing out) considerably increases if weโ€™re not putting protections in place to look after them.

โ€œSometimes you have to protect them from themselves because (backing up) has been worn as a badge of honour. You donโ€™t want a situationโ€ฆ where a player feels obligated to back up when they know theyโ€™re not in the best position to do so.โ€

While Penrith have already decided to rest their Origin players for this weekโ€™s clash against Wests Tigers, theyโ€™re six points clear at the top of the table. As competition for other spots in the post-season heats up, not every team and player will feel they have that freedom.

โ€œWorkers have restrictions on their ability to do double-shifts and overtime because theyโ€™ll do it if given the chance.

โ€œBut like any workplace, the duty of care doesnโ€™t fall at the feet of the employee. Itโ€™s up to those looking after them โ€“ and thatโ€™s all of us โ€“ to take responsibility.

1 COMMENT

  1. If the NRL will not sanction send-offs and gives derisory fines for fighting, then it is unlikely that they will take seriously their duty of care. I think that the Players Association is the only body that can influence them.

Comments are closed.