With some of the NRLโs best players aiming to represent their clubs within 48 hours of one of the most brutal State of Origin contests of all time, The Daily Telegraphโs Dean Ritchie reports that the RLPA has approached the NRL about a blanket ban on players being asked to back-up after Origin.
With a new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) due to be implemented next season, RLPA Chief Executive Clint Newton hopes to have a mandatory stand-down rule added to the terms.
โNowhere in the world in any code of this kind, where itโs high-speed, high-collision, would we see athletes back up within 48 hours of a match,โ Newton told the Telegraph.
โThis is the playersโ workplace. Would we expect Makybe Diva to back up in a second Melbourne Cup two days later?
โWe donโt allow truck drivers to work for long hours. We have a duty of care to the players.
โAfter Wednesdayโs match, not one person (would disagree) that was one of the most demanding and physical games of rugby league that anyone would have seen.
โIt was a classic example of why itโs essential to ensure the players are given appropriate time to rest and recover. Iโd suggest standing down players from club duties post-Origin is absolutely on the agenda through the CBA.
โFans want to make sure the best players are playing in the big matches. The risk (of players missing out) considerably increases if weโre not putting protections in place to look after them.
โSometimes you have to protect them from themselves because (backing up) has been worn as a badge of honour. You donโt want a situationโฆ where a player feels obligated to back up when they know theyโre not in the best position to do so.โ
While Penrith have already decided to rest their Origin players for this weekโs clash against Wests Tigers, theyโre six points clear at the top of the table. As competition for other spots in the post-season heats up, not every team and player will feel they have that freedom.
โWorkers have restrictions on their ability to do double-shifts and overtime because theyโll do it if given the chance.
โBut like any workplace, the duty of care doesnโt fall at the feet of the employee. Itโs up to those looking after them โ and thatโs all of us โ to take responsibility.
If the NRL will not sanction send-offs and gives derisory fines for fighting, then it is unlikely that they will take seriously their duty of care. I think that the Players Association is the only body that can influence them.