Day one of the Zac Lomax and Parramatta Eels trial began on Monday morning, with the hearing expected to run across seven days, including further sittings on March 13 and 17.
The start of proceedings was delayed multiple times on Monday as behind-the-scenes talks continued.
However, the court was told that the Storm and the Eels are “very close” to an agreement on the terms for Lomax to join Melbourne Storm.
Lomax's barrister, Adam Casselden SC, told the court that discussions had carried on late into Sunday night and were ongoing.
After Monday's delays, Casselden asked for the matter to be stood over until Tuesday, with Parramatta agreeing to return to court at 10 am.
“My present instructions are that the parties are very close to a resolution,” he said.
“I always wish both parties well in their attempts to resolve their differences,” Justice Kunc replied while granting the adjournment.
The Melbourne Storm are keen on securing Lomax as soon as possible, after confirming that their star winger, Xavier Coates, will be unavailable for the first few months of the season due to an Achilles injury.
One suggestion from Parramatta was to delay Lomax's availability until Round 2, which would prevent him from playing against the Eels in the season opener for Melbourne.
Court documents reveal the details of negotiations between the clubs.
Melbourne chairman Matt Tripp rejected a player swap proposed by Parramatta and initially offered a $100,000 transfer fee, later increasing it to $200,000.
Documents show Melbourne ultimately proposed $300,000, with $211,000 in salary cap relief and $89,000 as a transfer fee.
Lomax's legal team claims Parramatta demanded “unreasonable and unrealistic” transfer fees and breached the deed of release by unfairly stopping him from signing with another NRL club.
His lawyers also argue the Eels benefited from releasing him, including by freeing up salary cap space.
Parramatta, meanwhile, points to a January 21 text from Storm chief executive Justin Rodski to NRL chief executive Andrew Abdo.
“Hi Andrew, not getting anywhere at this point, can you apply the blow torch on Parramatta to get this done?” the text read.
The message continued.
“Lomax staying in the NRL is obviously a win for the game.”
In their filings, the Eels expressed their grievances.
“This message was an attempt to use the NRL to place pressure on the Parramatta Eels to resolve the matter on terms acceptable to the Melbourne Storm.”
Negotiations are expected to continue throughout Monday afternoon, with the hearing to continue on Tuesday, March 3.
These last-minute discussions could possibly bring a premature end to this legal dispute and see Lomax run out for Storm by Round 2.
Get set for the footy with the FREE Zero Tackle 2026 NRL Season Guide! Packed with 130+ pages of player profiles, team previews, insights and analysis, the 2026 NRL Season Guide is built for fans who want the full picture. Download your free Season Guide HERE.
Unless it’s a player swap I don’t see where Parra gets a win out of this, NRL always giving Melbourne what they want
Tyler, I sort of agree with you.
1) Surely the Storm has NO decent player available to offer to the Eels, after having lost Katoa and lost Pappenhuyzen ?
2) And what use is $211K of cap to Parra for 2026 ? They are not going to be able to use $211K to pay the wages of someone decent coming from Melbourne. And they may not have sufficient remaining cap space to pay him the $500K (or whatever) he is worth.
3) And what happens in 2027 ? They will surely have to let go someone (or more) to make up enough cap space to pay full-freight on this guy from the Storm.
But most of all, I feel that Lomax will be getting off free as a bird !
He signed a “No NRL until 2028” clause as part of his release, and he will have broken that agreement, and will have received no sanction.
That leaves a nasty taste in my mouth.