After the media outlet agreed to a mammoth broadcast rights deal with the AFL last week, itโ€™s been reported that the NRL will seek tens of millions of dollars in compensation from Foxtel.

The NRLโ€™s current deal, which was negotiated in the context of the early days of the COVID pandemic, was supposed to include a โ€œmost-favouredโ€ clause, which the Sydney Morning Herald reports would have prohibited the broadcaster from making a better deal with the AFL in the future without compensating the NRL for the significant sacrifice they made during challenging times.

This request was rejected by Foxtel, but reports suggest NRL clubs were under the impression that the current deal could be renegotiated before the completion of its seven-year term if the AFL were given a better package during that time.

The current deal sees the NRL receiving around $200 million per season from Foxtel, which becomes $400 million when combined with the free-to-air agreement reached with Channel 9 and other outlets.

As it stands, the AFLโ€™s deal is worth $640 million per year, with $400 million of that coming directly from Foxtel.

2025 NRL Season Guide

DOWNLOAD NOW FOR FREE!

Peter Vโ€™Landys and Andrew Abdo have both come under fire since the AFLโ€™s deal made headlines, accused of leaving money on the table during the NRLโ€™s negotiations.

Vโ€™Landys is confident an agreement can be reached but is refusing to comment since his initial response last week.

The Herald reports that there was a perceived verbal agreement between the NRL and Foxtel that the NRLโ€™s desire to make concessions to strike a deal during the uncertain times of the pandemic would be rewarded in the future.

โ€œAt the time, Fox needed an asset on its sheet to continue its viability. If we didnโ€™t come to play, thereโ€™d be no Foxtel,โ€ Vโ€™Landys told the Herald.

โ€œIf Foxtel coughs, all the codes catch a cold. If you havenโ€™t got them in play, the other parties wonโ€™t be paying as much as they should. You need that competitive tension.

โ€œWhen COVID hit, they were the only ones. If they went under, there was no one else available.โ€

Vโ€™Landys is currently embroiled in financial battles on multiple fronts, also involved in an ongoing dispute with the NSW Government regarding the suburban ground funding withdrawals in the wake of the recent NSW flood disaster.